Smaller than milliseconds?

Ray G. Miller rgmiller at pacbell.net
Fri Jul 11 14:33:00 EDT 2003


From: Dar Scott <dsc at swcp.com>

>>try this:
> 
> on mouseUp
>    put the long seconds into time1
>    put the long seconds into time2
>    put "the long seconds: " & time2 && "delta: " & (time2-time1) & LF 
> into field "Report"
>    put the ticks into time1
>    put the ticks into time2
>    put "the ticks: " & time2 && "delta: " & (time2-time1) & LF after 
> field "Report"
>    put the milliseconds into time1
>    put the milliseconds into time2
>    put "the milliseconds: " & time2 && "delta: " & (time2-time1) & LF 
> after field "Report"
>    put the long ticks into time1
>    put the long ticks into time2
>    put "the long ticks: " & time2 && "delta: " & (time2-time1) & LF 
> after field "Report"
>    put the long milliseconds into time1
>    put the long milliseconds into time2
>    put "the long milliseconds: " & time2 && "delta: " & (time2-time1) & LF after field "Report"
> end mouseUp
> 
> On my OS X, I get this:
> 
> the long seconds: 1057873624.51924 delta: 0.000009
> the ticks: 63472417471 delta: 0
> the milliseconds: 1057873624527 delta: 0
> the long ticks: 63472417471.80954 delta: 0.000778
> the long milliseconds: 1057873624533.140991 delta: 0.014038
> 


Yep, the same thing (at a different time ;-) ) with MOS 9.2...

the long seconds: 1057947474.546898 delta: 0.000007
the ticks: 63476848472 delta: 0
the milliseconds: 1057947474549 delta: 0
the long ticks: 63476848473.015358 delta: 0.000359
the long milliseconds: 1057947474551.332031 delta: 0.005005

I guess we can compare the actual speed of our CPUs.

Looks like mine is a bit quicker.... ;-)

Ray G. Miller
__________________
Turtlelips Productions
4009 Everett Ave.
Oakland, CA 94602
MailTo:rgmiller at pacbell.net
(V) 510.530.1971
(F) 510.482.3491




More information about the metacard mailing list