<HTML>
<BODY>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Richard,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Not your fault, it's mine. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Im at fault for hijacking the subject
to rev. I thought it important to make the point to the wider audience
- mostly PC users who will be seriously disapointed at the apparent lack
of testing in 2.7 for winXP.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">cheers<br>
Xavier Bury<br>
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>metacard-bounces@lists.runrev.com wrote on 16.02.2006
07:27:29:<br>
<br>
> MisterX wrote:<br>
> > Sims said<br>
> > <br>
> >>>> I'm planning on sticking with 2.6.1 until at least
a <br>
> >> version or two of upgrades are announced.<br>
> > <br>
> >>> Rev 2.6.1 for at least a week (if not more).<br>
> >>> TEST TEST TEST, then sell.<br>
> >>><br>
> > <br>
> > This feels more like the microsoft software release process -
release, sell<br>
> > THEN fix... <br>
> > <br>
> > I too am reverting to 2.6. It's pretty obvious that 2.7 was NOT
<br>
> > tested on windows as it should have.<br>
> <br>
> As a tester who's been too wrapped up meeting client deadlines, I
feel <br>
> partially reponsible.<br>
> <br>
> But I'm writing mostly to try to determine how this thread went from
<br>
> being only on the MC list to also being on the Rev list?<br>
> <br>
> Is it a glitch in the server, or in one of the contributors to this
thread?<br>
> <br>
> I'll have to be extra careful, since I tend to feel a bit more free
on <br>
> this smaller MC list, and try to exercise a little more careful <br>
> judgement on the much bigger Rev list.<br>
> <br>
> In the future, if someone decides to expand a thread to include another
<br>
> list I think it would be good form to note that in the message.<br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> Richard Gaskin<br>
> Fourth World Media Corporation<br>
> ___________________________________________________________<br>
> Ambassador@FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> metacard mailing list<br>
> metacard@lists.runrev.com<br>
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard<br>
</tt></font>
<P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
To make communications with Clearstream easier, Clearstream has<br>recently changed the email address format to conform with industry<br>standards. The new format is 'firstname.familyname@clearstream.com'.<br><br>Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com<br><br>IMPORTANT MESSAGE<br><br>Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream<br>International does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of<br>this message.<br><br>The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be<br>legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are<br>not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or<br>any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is<br>prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are<br>those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically<br>states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of<br>its affiliates or subsidiaries.<br><br>END OF DISCLAIMER
</STRONG></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>