MC and UB

[Klaus Major]

Hi all,

> Ken Ray wrote:
>> On 8/22/06 3:10 AM, "Klaus Major" <klaus at major-k.de> wrote:
>>> Short question:
>>>
>>> Since the ONLY new thing in the IDE will be support for UB on OS X,
>>> is it OK to deliver/save it in 2.7 stack format???
>>>
>>> It needs the 2.7x engine for UBs anyway!
>> Well, normally I'd say "Yes", but some of us may still be swapping  
>> stacks
>> with older copies of MC for a short while, so if it's possible to  
>> save in
>> the format the stack came in, and if someone tries to make a UB  
>> standalone
>> out of a legacy format stack, alert the user that if they  
>> continue, the
>> stack will be saved in 2.7 format.
>
> I'm with Ken on this one:  the older format lets us use the latest  
> IDE with either engine, but the new format limits it to only the  
> most recent engine.  I do projects in both, and when I work in v2.7  
> I have it set up to save in the older format.
>
> I would vote for imposing no limit that isn't absolutely necessary.  
> Saving in the older format allows a choice that the newer format  
> doesn't.

OK, OK, OK, poll finished, will deliver in "legacy" stack format :-)

>  Richard Gaskin
>  Fourth World Media Corporation
>  ___________________________________________________________
>  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com

Regards

Klaus Major
klaus at major-k.de
http://www.major-k.de