new libURL?

[Richard Gaskin]

Thank you for the summary and the URLs.

Dave Cragg wrote:
> BTW, have you had any more thoughts on how to handle the "split" 
> versions of libUrl we now have for the MC IDE?

Yeah:  have one version that's also backwardly compatible.  :)

But seriously, I've been giving it some thought and while it's easy to 
accomodate the IDE it's less easy to accomodate existing scripts that 
call "start using liburl".

We could do this:  have libURL be just a shell whose libraryStack 
handler does a version check and inserts one of two button scripts into 
the backscripts.

Can you folks think of any reason that wouldn't be a good idea?

One downside is that if we continue to use Resource Mover for that it 
will move two copied of the script into the target stack, and only one 
of them is needed in a standalone.

What do you folks think?

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  ___________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com