ReSet passkey (was "For xxx sake!")
Robert Brenstein
rjb at robelko.com
Wed Sep 15 12:17:29 EDT 2004
>So what's the next step? How easily/quickly can Tuv (?) close the loophole
>that has been created in 2.6.1 so "clone" (and other commands that have now
>been disabled) can be made to work again in a protected stack? I am assuming
>bribary is allowed?
I guess vote for bug 546 :) As you can see from its number, it has
been entered a long long time ago. If enough people vote on it, may
be it will be addressed. Technically, does not seem much work for me
since most of the code is already there.
>And what's the workaround to allow 2.6.1 users access the features in a
>protected stack with these requirements?
I guess the only way is to close and reopen stack if that does not
mess things up for you.
Robert
More information about the metacard
mailing list