Open Source Licence (LGPL or GPL)
Ray G. Miller
rgmiller at pacbell.net
Tue Sep 9 15:33:00 EDT 2003
From: Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com>
> David Bovill wrote:
>
>
>>The simple
>>story is to use the LGPL if you may wish to distribute the open source
>>code with 'linked' libraries (read IDE or engine here) which is not GPL'd.
>
>
> Hmmm.... I had never considered including the Rev engine with the MC IDE
> distribution. It would be convenient, given the dissection required for OS
> X, but in my mind it keeps everything clean and simple to distribute only
> the IDE.
>
Has anyone checked:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html
Ray G. Miller
__________________
Turtlelips Productions
4009 Everett Ave.
Oakland, CA 94602
MailTo:rgmiller at pacbell.net
(V) 510.530.1971
(F) 510.482.3491
More information about the metacard
mailing list