About MC/RR applications servers

[bernard.devlin at knowledgeworks.plus.com]

Thanks Pierre

>>
Just do tests and you will see as me that this works perfectly, faster
for example, than in using ASP's or PHP commands, because the linux bash
optimisations, because the psql perfect design to work in command-line
pipe mode.
<<
Well, this is rather flabberghasting...
I suppose it does fit in with the unix philosophy.  I am prepared to 
believe you, and when I get the time I will try to do some comparisons for 
myself.

>>
I just remplace all of them by metatalk/transcript calculations on very
simple SQL requests replies
<<
With regard to SPs, triggers, etc.. I still don't understand why you do 
not use them.  Is it because they do not work, because they are slow, or 
because you just prefer to do it in Transcript?

>>
75% of writes on databases going from some megs (events statistics) up
to 250 Megs of datas, with, as an average, no more than 10 Megs peer
table
<<
And it is basically a write-intensive application? 
Do I understand correctly that each write can be several megabytes?
And that the database size is around 250mb?

>>
Suse 8 Pro x86 - Athlon 800 1 Go Ram - server. All the other
apps are hosted on 3 st box, again Suse 8 Pro x86 - Athlon 800 1 Go Ram.
<<
Each server has 1gb of RAM?  Do you find you need that much?
I suppose if your queries are write-intensive this extra RAM is not there 
to boost PostgreSQL's cache?

I'm in agreement about OS X being slow compared to Linux.  Imagine running 
Linux on Panther :-)

Bernard 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/metacard/attachments/20030712/4eeea14b/attachment.htm